Questions · Victory Truck Body
· / 9
Victory Truck Body
Rustin asked two of these last week. The rest are the ones I would want answered if I were sitting on your side of it.
01
That is the published industry figure, not my estimate. I would rather you heard it from me than found it on your own later.
What is interesting is that the software is almost never the reason. The same seven causes come up again and again, and every one of them is a project decision rather than a technical one.
02
Same seven, in the same order, with where each one sits in what I have proposed.
I am not claiming this cannot go wrong. I am saying I know the seven ways it usually does, and the plan is shaped around each of them.
03
This is the question I would want answered before signing anything, so here is the whole of it.
What I do need is this, and the list does not grow after you sign.
On pricing, I would rather not have it.
I will build the structure and your team enters the numbers into it. Your margins stay yours and I never need to see them.
The quote pages hold a company name, a reference, a specification and a price. No individual contact details, no payment information, nothing that would matter if it were read by the wrong person.
Where I do hold anything on your behalf it is covered by a data processing schedule in my terms, which sets out that I only process it on your instruction, and hand it back or delete it whenever you ask.
04
Scoping happens in the first two weeks, before any modelling starts. It is a handful of questions rather than a workshop, and most of them can be answered on a message.
Here they are now, so nothing about it is a surprise.
05
Yes, and I would expect to change a fair bit of it.
What you have seen was built from an option list and a week of research. It was not built from watching how Victory actually works, because I have not seen that. So some of it will be wrong, and the review rounds inside Phase One exist for exactly that reason.
Design, layout, wording, the order things happen in, how the workflow runs. All of that is yours to shape. It is expected, not extra.
Where it becomes a quote rather than a change is genuinely new capability. A whole new option group, or another body range. That is new parts and new rules rather than adjusting what is already there.
Once it is live, most day to day changes are data rather than code. Option names, values, wording, colours. Either I do those on a message, or your own team edits them directly. I would recommend the second.
06
Because it is a different job, and this does not replace it.
CPQ configures and prices. It is good at that. What it does not do is produce the thing your customer actually looks at. They still receive text.
This sits in front of your quoting, not instead of it.
It takes a specification and turns it into something a fleet buyer can see, and a dimensioned drawing a leasing company can fund against.
Worth knowing for the comparison: a Salesforce CPQ project on its own runs to a median of around eighty eight thousand dollars over fourteen weeks. That is before anything visual exists.
07
Less than most projects of this size, and I would rather set the expectation properly than undersell it.
The real ask is the option part files, and somebody senior enough to answer questions about how you actually build. Realistically an hour or two a week during scoping, a review round when the renders land, and a look at the finished pages before go live.
The honest risk to the timeline is the part files. If those arrive late, the dates move by the same number of days. Everything else is on me.
08
Rustin's words, and a fair question for a business betting on one person in another country.
The formal version of this in our industry is source code escrow, where a third party holds the code and releases it if something happens to the supplier. It costs a couple of thousand a year, and it only ever grants access, never ownership.
You are getting the better half of that arrangement for nothing.
And the quote pages themselves are static files. Every quote ever generated keeps working, even if every system of mine goes dark.
09
You have already clicked the part most projects are still arguing about at week ten.
Beyond that, the payment structure is half at the start and half at go live. If we never reach go live, the second half is never invoiced. The monthly does not begin until it is running either, and there is no minimum term on it.
Phase One is one body range out of several, deliberately. It proves the approach on your highest volume product before anything else is committed to. If you want to go further still, we can go live with two or three salespeople first and widen it once they are happy. That is a rollout decision rather than a commercial one, and it changes nothing about the price.
If there is a question in the room that is not on this page, send it over and I will answer that one straight too.